MyPrivateBanking Blog
Daily Comments on the World of Wealth Management

Archive for May, 2016

Interview: “Morningstar meets TripAdvisor”

Tuesday, May 31st, 2016

In the following interview Oren Kaplan, the CEO of SharingAlpha, explains what the new firm is all about and why it is important to the wealth management industry.

MyPrivateBanking: Oren, can you explain the idea behind “SharingAlpha” in a few words?

Oren Kaplan: SharingAlpha is a user generated fund rating platform, or in other words, it’s where Morningstar meets TripAdvisor! SharingAlpha will also rank the fund raters in terms of their fund selection capabilities which will allow fund selectors and investment advisors to build their own proven track record. The users will also be able to construct a number of virtual fund of funds and SharingAlpha will rank them according to their asset allocation performance.

MPB: Why do you think that the collective fund ratings of investment advisors offer valuable insights given that we all have seen over and over againg that more than 80% of active fund managers are collectively not beating simple index strategies?

OK: Funds will receive a high SharingAlpha rating only when the different raters expect the fund to beat the passive alternative. Predictions based on collective wisdom have been proven to work in plenty of cases. Furthermore, qualitative fund analysis - using for example factors such as cost, capacity and active share - have also been proven to work and using a large group of market experts will make this task possible.

MPB: Is SharingAlpha also interesting for afffluent and high-net-worth investors?

OK: Yes, the fund ratings and raters ranking will certainly be followed by all types of investors.

MPB: How can the private banking industry take advantage of SharingAlpha’s offer?

OK: Number one, to improve fund selection and asset allocation recommendations based on the collective wisdom that will be shared on SharingAlpha. Number two, to build their track record and prove to clients that they are able to add value to their portfolio and justify their fees.

MPB: Thank you, Oren!

 

New Report: Mobile Apps for Wealth Management

Monday, May 30th, 2016

the-question-for-wealth-managers-is-no-longer-if-they-should-have-a-mobile-app-but-how-they-can-develop-a-winning-mobile-app11

The question for wealth managers is no longer if they should have a mobile app, but how they can develop a winning mobile app to provide them with an essential competitive advantage.

Almost eight years ago, in July 2008 the Apple App store was launched and Google Play followed only a few months later. Since then the app market has grown, apps have become an essential part of our lives and the technical possibilities have developed a lot. The wealth management industry is typically not among the first movers when it comes to technical innovations but we have seen that the market of mobile apps for wealth management is slowly but surely catching up. In our latest study Mobile Apps for Wealth Management we have analyzed the mobile apps of 30 of the biggest wealth managers worldwide. We have found that in contrast to the previous years, the number of wealth managers that offer dedicated apps to their wealthy clients has increased (from 63% in 2015 to 82% in our latest 2016 study).

(more…)

 

New survey: Investors surprisingly open when it comes to robo-advisors

Tuesday, May 10th, 2016

Our new report on investors’ attitudes towards robo-advisors is based on a survey covering (mass-)affluent and HNWI in the UK and the US. The 600 respondents answered questions with regard to their awareness of robo advice, benefits and risks of automated investing, awareness of existing players and many others.

One of the main findings is that investors are generally very open to the new technology as more than 70% believe that automated advisory tools can positively influence their wealth manager’s advice and decision-making process. Particularly when it comes to onboarding processes, investors see huge benefits in automated online tools – 74% think that the technology is likely to speed up registration and, hence, lead to an increased efficiency and convenience.

Similarly encouraging, investors’ awareness of the robo technology is surprisingly high: 45% of the entire sample already heard or read about the concept of robo-advisors and 20% state to know quite a lot about it or even know it in detail. At the same time, the share of people saying that they don’t think to be using robo advice in the future is 20%, which is mainly driven by the older age segment with 55 years and above. Interestingly, the share of the hesitant appears to be more than twice as high in the US (28%) than in the UK (12%).

In the US, the largest share of respondents selected Charles Schwab Intelligent Portfolios as the brand they associate most with robo advice (43%) while in the UK, it is Nutmeg that leads the field, with the same share. This is quite interesting since original robo providers such as Betterment (18%) or Wealthfront (13%) seem to be far less known – this is a strong sign that it is a lot easier for established wealth management brands to promote their automated services.

Our new survey report elaborates on these and a lot more findings that draw a very clear picture of wealthy investors’ adoption of the robo advice technology. In addition to the general results, the report describes the main differences among the two focus countries, UK and USA, different wealth segments (mass affluent, affluent, and high-net-worth) as well as different age segments in order to derive valuable recommendations and learning points dedicated to wealth managers’ target client groups.

 
Subscribe